Tim+
2020-02-01 14:39:26 UTC
There was an odd comment in the Times a couple of days ago (on the dangers
of “smart” motorways) about how electric cars can’t coast as far as normal
cars in the event of a breakdown (to potentially reach a refuge bay) and
how they couldn’t go on a low loader.
The first point I can sort of get my head around if there’s no clutch and
the wheels are always connected to the motors but the second point leaves
me baffled.
From the article in question...
“Edmund King, the AA’s president, told the Police Federation yesterday that
his plea for more lay-bys was ignored four years ago. He also suggested
that electric cars would make smart motorways effectively obsolete because
they could not “coast” to a lay-by when they had a fault. “They do not
coast as far as a combustible engine car. You can’t tow them on a low
loader,” he said.”
Any thoughts? Is he talking through his arse?
Tim
of “smart” motorways) about how electric cars can’t coast as far as normal
cars in the event of a breakdown (to potentially reach a refuge bay) and
how they couldn’t go on a low loader.
The first point I can sort of get my head around if there’s no clutch and
the wheels are always connected to the motors but the second point leaves
me baffled.
From the article in question...
“Edmund King, the AA’s president, told the Police Federation yesterday that
his plea for more lay-bys was ignored four years ago. He also suggested
that electric cars would make smart motorways effectively obsolete because
they could not “coast” to a lay-by when they had a fault. “They do not
coast as far as a combustible engine car. You can’t tow them on a low
loader,” he said.”
Any thoughts? Is he talking through his arse?
Tim
--
Please don't feed the trolls
Please don't feed the trolls